Take Action

Add your name to these public comments to be submitted to MDEQ by signing this petition.

OWDMTake Action Now

Michigan’s year-long study of Line 5 alternatives has been released. Now is the time to submit your comment calling for the only way to truly protect the Great Lakes from an oil spill: decommission the Enbridge Line 5 pipelines through the Straits of Mackinac.

Protect the Great Lakes from a Catastrophic Oil Spill

Deadline for comments is August 4, so please submit yours today via this online form in support of protecting the Great Lakes from a catastrophic oil spill.

To the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Michigan Agency for Energy, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, and Office of the Attorney General:

I am writing to submit my official comment in response to the State of Michigan’s Line 5 alternatives analysis. This report was expressly commissioned for the overall purpose of “providing the State, Enbridge and the public with information that can be used to help guide decisions for the future of [Line 5 in the Straits].”

I am deeply disappointed in this analysis and this process riddled with conflict of interest. It lacks credibility because Dynamic Risk, a firm with ties to Enbridge, is its author. Even worse, it absurdly underestimates the impact of a spill and ignores a viable alternative to Line 5 – use of existing infrastructure. An expert review in December 2015 by advisors to a Great Lakes policy organization documented the practicality of this alternative.

Decommissioning Line 5 in the Straits of Mackinac is the only alternative that will prevent an oil spill with catastrophic consequences for the Great Lakes and the State of Michigan. It is time for the state to stop delaying action with flawed studies, exercise its legal duty as public trustee, and shut down Line 5. The state should use that authority through enforcement of its easement, an agreement that Enbridge has consistently violated. 

Specifically, the draft report on alternatives to Line 5 in the Mackinac Straits:

  1. Fails to follow the recommendations and standards outlined in the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report and should be withdrawn.
  2. Neglects to provide the state with an independent, fair analysis of the alternatives to Line 5. This report is clearly biased toward allowing Line 5 to continue to operate and/or allowing Enbridge to build new oil infrastructure and further expand its operations. That bias grows out of past, and potentially future, business relationships between Enbridge and the report’s authors. Clearly, the authors are not “wholly independent from any influence by Enbridge,” a standard for establishing credibility in the report’s findings that is outlined in the Task Force Report.
  3. Ignores using existing pipeline infrastructure as an alternative to Line 5 in the Straits, which was one of the alternatives the state required Dynamic Risk to analyze, and leaving it out is in conflict with Task Force recommendation 3 (b). It is unacceptable that the contractor eliminated this alternative in the early stages of analysis, and this must be remedied in the final report.
  4. Does not provide a worst-case scenario spill and cost analysis, which was one of the main objectives of this report and was specifically required by the state in its request for proposals under Section II-B. Instead, Dynamic Risk uses assumptions of risk that are woefully inadequate and are not credible. It estimates that:
    • Only 20-miles of shoreline would be impacted by a spill. This is 3% of the 720-mile area the University of Michigan found vulnerable to a spill in its 2016 study.
    • An oil spill would cost $100 to $200 million when Enbridge’s cleanup costs of its Kalamazoo River Line 6B pipeline oil spill in 2010 cost more than $1.2 billion.
  5. Overestimates an impact to propane supply, greatly exceeding what independent experts have determined would be necessary to provide the Upper Peninsula’s Rapid River facility with an alternative supply. The flawed report finds that up to 35 railcars per week or 15 truckloads per day would be necessary, while another study found it would take only one railcar or 3 - 4 truckloads per day to replace Line 5 propane supply to the U.P.
  6. Shows unfair bias towards building a tunneled pipeline. The report estimates the cost of a tunnel much lower than other estimates for this type of infrastructure; it fails to consider the risk of a spill to the Great Lakes, rivers and streams from other portions of the 64-year-old pipeline if the Straits portion were rebuilt; and it fails to look at the other health and environmental consequences of allowing Enbridge to build a tunnel and further expand its transport of mostly Canadian oil through Michigan for export. Dynamic Risk has a preference for new pipelines, which was evident when the firm aggressively promoted building a tunnel in its proposal to do this report, and its analysis is deeply flawed.

The magnitude of the risk of a spill is too severe to allow Line 5 to continue to operate in the Great Lakes. Michigan should not put the Great Lakes, our economy, health, drinking water, fisheries, and way of life at risk from a catastrophic oil spill any longer.

I urge you to act as legal public trustees of our waters and bottomlands, enforce the ongoing easement violations, and begin the process of decommissioning Line 5 in the Straits of Mackinac to protect the Great Lakes from a catastrophic oil spill. The State of Michigan has an independent legal duty to take this enforcement action based on Enbridge’s ongoing violations.

Please note that submitting your public comment here has nothing to do with the Line 5 ballot proposal that is being circulated.


Goal: 11,000 comments

Will you submit your comment?

or Text SHUTDOWN to +12314804112 to sign or Text PROTECT to +12314804112 to sign

Showing 8825 reactions

  • signed 2017-09-13 16:14:54 -0400
  • signed 2017-09-13 15:44:18 -0400
  • signed 2017-09-13 15:30:02 -0400
    Let’s keep our Great Lakes clean!!
  • signed 2017-09-12 14:22:50 -0400
    Taylor Wilcox
  • signed 2017-09-12 09:50:06 -0400
    Decommission it NOW — violations of the easement and the quality of the Great Lakes water demands your action, A.G. Schuette! We absolutely must not continue to take a gamble with the water quality that our State depends on for tourism, drinking water and quality of life. NO pipeline is worth those risks.
  • signed via 2017-09-08 21:43:14 -0400
  • signed 2017-09-04 20:23:20 -0400
  • signed 2017-09-04 07:20:08 -0400
  • signed 2017-09-03 09:40:53 -0400
    Please, please take necessary action to implement regulation that monitors and forces oil pipeline companies to replace or fix aging pipelines as the voters and Michigan governing autauthorities see as safe and healthy for all of our beautiful state.
  • signed 2017-09-02 18:33:32 -0400
  • posted about this on Facebook 2017-09-02 15:06:38 -0400
    SIGN THE PETITION to tell the State of Mich. the only acceptable way to protect the Great Lakes is Shut Down Line 5.
  • signed 2017-08-31 22:27:26 -0400
    As I write this I am lying in bed just a few yards from the straits of mackinac. The fresh clear waves breaking on clean sandy beaches are my lullaby as they are for my family and many others here at wilderness state park. I hiked waugoschance point at sunrise this morning under eagles and osprey. My 7 year old daughter and I skipped stones in the surf at sunset. Last year we sat with her grandparents at this same spot and watched the northern lights dancing in the night sky. All of this goes away when the pipeline breaks as the pipeline in Marshall did 7 years pouring oil into our hometown of Battle Creek. Our clear fresh water and sandy beaches will never be he same if we do not shut down this pipeline. Enbridge will not protect this natural treasure. They will wait for it to break and then try to fix it. But an ecosystem is not a piece of pipe and our environment our family traditions and memories are more important than their profit margins. Let’s work together to make sure that our children can still skip pick clean smooth stones from sandy beaches and skip them across crystal clear waves with their children on this same spot and hike to the big cut at the end of the point under soaring osprey and eagles.
  • signed 2017-08-31 19:47:06 -0400
  • signed 2017-08-31 12:58:50 -0400
    Don’t risk our precious lakes!!!!
  • signed 2017-08-31 09:36:25 -0400
  • signed via 2017-08-28 14:21:39 -0400
  • signed via 2017-08-28 00:39:11 -0400
    Protect our last beautiful bodies of fresh water lakes. We need these waters because water is life!!!
  • signed 2017-08-27 22:00:07 -0400
  • signed 2017-08-27 11:25:08 -0400
  • signed via 2017-08-25 12:43:45 -0400
    No dollar amount is great enough to jeopardize the vitality of our great fresh lake. The line is drawn.
  • signed via 2017-08-24 23:56:06 -0400
    Please listen to reason.
  • signed via 2017-08-24 13:04:49 -0400
    A break in line 5, which is very possible, even likely, will be catastrophic to our state. Shut it down now!
  • signed 2017-08-23 16:51:03 -0400
  • signed 2017-08-23 15:15:47 -0400
  • signed 2017-08-23 13:35:15 -0400
    Holly Salas
  • signed via 2017-08-23 10:49:41 -0400
    Michael A. Mestelle
  • signed via 2017-08-23 09:02:13 -0400
    This should NEVER have been! We all know how these oil pipe lines BREAK! It’s just matter of time… The people of this great state need to protest until this is REMOVED! WE live here! We love these GREAT Lakes .. and want them to stay as CLEAN as possible. It’s ALWAYS about the MONEY!! Get out of Michigan’s water.
  • posted about this on Facebook 2017-08-22 10:39:41 -0400
    SIGN THE PETITION to tell the State of Mich. the only acceptable way to protect the Great Lakes is Shut Down Line 5.
  • @CourtneySGeorge tweeted link to this page. 2017-08-22 10:39:38 -0400
    SIGN THE PETITION to tell the State of Mich. the only acceptable way to protect the Great Lakes is Shut Down Line 5. http://www.oilandwaterdontmix.org/comment_to_shutdown?recruiter_id=51601
  • signed 2017-08-22 10:39:10 -0400
    we need to more toward alternative renewable energy resources in the wake of climate change. This is not a step towards that at all

You can help now.

Add your voice to those working for a clean Great Lakes & healthier economy.


Get updates