TAKE ACTION

Tell the DEQ they need to follow the law. Sign this petition now.

OWDMTake Action Now

The entire engineering of how the Line 5 pipeline is anchored to the Great Lakes bottomlands has changed - WITH NO STATE REVIEW or approval.

Enbridge is asking the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to approve the company’s application to add 22 new screw anchors to prop up Line 5. Enbridge is trying to get around a full legally-required review of the rest of the underwater portion of the pipeline and is ignoring the effect that these anchor supports will have on the integrity of the pipeline moving forward.

The original pipeline design did not specify the use of screw anchors. In fact, this type of anchor is responsible for a majority of the coating damage that Enbridge has known about since at least 2014, but the public just found out about in October 2017.

Anchors are not a repair - they're new infrastructure

According to state law, new materials used to support the pipeline should trigger a full integrity review of the entire underwater segment of Line 5. The DEQ has failed to follow the law, and in doing so, they have failed to hold Enbridge responsible - even with the Great Lakes ecosystem and 720 miles of shoreline at risk.

Sign the Petition

Director Grether, Division and Unit Chief Fish, and the Gaylord Office Unit Supervisor Haas, and Great Lakes Submerged Land Specialist Graft:

We urge you to deny Enbridge’s pending Line 5 anchor permit application to install 22 new screw anchors onto the bottomlands of Lake Michigan, and instead, require Enbridge to file a new conveyance application for the entire underwater Line 5 pipelines to occupy our public trust waters and bottomlands of the Great Lakes. This is what the law requires.

Enbridge’s Screw Anchors Constitute a New Design, Not a Repair. Since 2002, Enbridge has installed 128 permanent screw anchors along Line 5 fastened into the lakebed, contending that this new design is mere repair and maintenance. This new engineering design, however, has transformed the entire underwater pipeline infrastructure by elevating it off the lakebed floor.

The original 1953 engineering design placed Line 5 pipelines in a trench on the bottomlands with no maximum support longer than 75 feet to prevent metal fatigue and rupture. This engineering design was a key provision of the 1953 legal Easement between Enbridge and the State of Michigan. But Enbridge routinely violated the 75-foot maximum span requirement and did not properly design its dual pipelines to withstand the swift currents in the Straits of Mackinac.

For nearly the first 50 years of Line 5 occupying the public trust waters of Lake Michigan, Enbridge used sandbags to provide support. Enbridge’s “solution” – to elevate the pipeline off the lakebed floor with screw anchors – is not a mere repair, but rather a completely new design that was never authorized and has never been evaluated under the 1955 public trust law of the Great Lakes Submerged Lands Act (“GLSLA”).

New Evidence Reveals that Enbridge Knew Screw Anchors Were Damaging Line 5 Pipeline Coating Since 2014. In October 2017 – four months after Enbridge submitted the original DEQ permit — the public learned that Enbridge had acted in bad faith and had known about damage to Line 5’s protective coating in the Straits of Mackinac as early as 2014 but did not disclose this critical information to state or federal officials until late in the summer of 2017. This material information could have altered previous state and federal authorizations in 2016 and 2017 that allowed additional screw anchors to be installed into the lakebed.

Material Change Triggers Full Review of Entire Underwater Pipeline Infrastructure. Given Line 5’s new design with permanent structures and material changes, the DEQ must direct Enbridge to go back to the drawing board and submit a new conveyance application under the law. Nothing less than this will protect the Great Lakes from a catastrophic oil spill.

2,232 SIGNATURES
Help Reach the Next Goal: 2,500 signatures

Will you sign?


Showing 2185 reactions

  • Jo Kelly
    signed 2018-02-18 17:50:52 -0500
  • Carol Hendrie
    signed 2018-02-18 17:49:03 -0500
  • Chris Karounos
    @ChrisKarounos tweeted link to this page. 2018-02-18 17:46:03 -0500
    Join me and SIGN THIS PETITION. The DEQ must demand a review of the Line 5 pipeline before approving more anchors. http://www.oilandwaterdontmix.org/review_the_line_5_pipeline?recruiter_id=56966
  • Chris Karounos
    signed 2018-02-18 17:45:49 -0500
  • John Marin
    signed 2018-02-18 17:44:11 -0500
  • Robert Korstanje
    posted about this on Facebook 2018-02-18 17:43:39 -0500
    Tom van disJoin me and SIGN THIS PETITION. The DEQ must demand a review of the Line 5 pipeline before approving more anchors.
  • Robert Korstanje
    signed 2018-02-18 17:42:37 -0500
    Robert Korstanje
  • Allen Salyer
    signed 2018-02-18 17:38:19 -0500
  • Nicholas Mouzourakis
    signed 2018-02-18 17:38:00 -0500
  • Caroline de Mauriac
    posted about this on Facebook 2018-02-18 17:36:12 -0500
    Join me and SIGN THIS PETITION. The DEQ must demand a review of the Line 5 pipeline before approving more anchors.
  • Caroline de Mauriac
    signed 2018-02-18 17:35:53 -0500
  • Yvonne Goddard
    signed via 2018-02-18 17:35:52 -0500
  • Stacy Shafto
    signed 2018-02-18 17:33:57 -0500
  • David Bobier
    signed 2018-02-18 17:23:04 -0500
  • Marilyn Alimpich
    signed 2018-02-18 17:20:05 -0500
    It seems our elected officials are waiting until another disaster strikes Michigan waters (remember Flint). We need to STOP the OIL NOW.
  • Richard Booth
    signed 2018-02-18 17:12:18 -0500
  • Lyn Berling
    signed 2018-02-18 17:11:43 -0500
  • Carol Johnson
    signed 2018-02-18 17:09:29 -0500
  • Maria Woloson
    signed 2018-02-18 17:05:07 -0500
  • Jim Head
    signed 2018-02-18 17:03:49 -0500
    Jim H Head
  • Jodi Holden
    signed 2018-02-18 17:03:41 -0500
  • Jerilynn Tucker
    signed 2018-02-18 17:01:02 -0500
    I attended and spoke at the December 11 PPSAB meeting. I witnessed Board member Craig Hupp present a brochure that accompanies the equipment Enbridge recently purchased for the purpose of cleaning up an oil spill. Mr. Hupp read from the brochure about the limitations of the equipment, which includes being nonoperational in waves over 3.3 feet high. I also heard Captain Chris Kalenske state that the Coast Guard is on record that they cannot be effective in waves over 3 feet high. A video record of these statements should be available because filming was taking place during the meeting.
  • Joanne Tollison
    signed 2018-02-18 17:00:19 -0500
  • Denise Wunderlich
    posted about this on Facebook 2018-02-18 16:59:44 -0500
    Join me and SIGN THIS PETITION. The DEQ must demand a review of the Line 5 pipeline before approving more anchors.
  • Denise Wunderlich
    signed 2018-02-18 16:59:29 -0500
  • William Gonzalez
    signed 2018-02-18 16:56:12 -0500
  • Patricia Cox
    signed 2018-02-18 16:55:35 -0500
  • Ron Kardos
    posted about this on Facebook 2018-02-18 16:54:29 -0500
    Join me and SIGN THIS PETITION. The DEQ must demand a review of the Line 5 pipeline before approving more anchors.
  • Gail Lockhart
    signed 2018-02-18 16:54:25 -0500
  • Tom Pietras
    signed 2018-02-18 16:54:15 -0500

You can help now.


Join those working to protect the Great Lakes & climate from the Enbridge Line 5 crude oil pipeline.

Get updates