Take Action

Add your name to these public comments to be submitted to Michigan state agencies by signing this petition.

PLEASE NOTE! The State of Michigan has closed the comment period. You may still sign the petition here, but the State of Michigan will not recieve your comment.

OWDMTake Action Now

Last June, the preliminary Line 5 Alternatives Study was released, and more than 23,000 people submitted their comment calling for the shutdown of Line 5 as the only alternative that will truly protect the Great Lakes from an oil spill. The revised and final Alternatives Study has just been released, which has triggered a second comment period that is now open.

Prevent a Catastrophic Great Lakes Oil Spill

The deadline for public comments is December 22, 2017, so please sign on and submit your comment today via this online form. Let's prevent a devastating oil spill in the Straits of Mackinac.

To the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Michigan Agency for Energy, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Michigan Governor, Michigan Attorney General, and Michigan Pipeline Safety Advisory Board:

I am writing to submit my official comment in response to the State of Michigan’s Line 5 final alternatives analysis dated October 26 and released on November 20. I am deeply disappointed in this final analysis. A draft alternatives report released in June was riddled with errors and omissions, and the final report contains most of the same failures.

This report fails to meet its overall purpose of “providing the State of Michigan and other interested parties with an independent, comprehensive analysis of alternatives to the existing Straits Pipelines, and the extent to which each alternative promotes the public health, safety, and welfare and protects the public trust resources of the Great Lakes.”

It lacks credibility because its author is Dynamic Risk, a firm with ties to Enbridge, the Canadian energy transport company that owns Line 5. Even worse, it absurdly underestimates the impact of a spill and ignores a viable alternative to Line 5 – use of existing infrastructure. An independent expert review in December 2015 documented the practicality of this alternative.

Decommissioning Line 5 in the Straits of Mackinac is the only alternative that will prevent an oil spill with catastrophic consequences for the Great Lakes and the State of Michigan. Moreover, this final alternative report affirms that decommissioning is a feasible option with zero risks to the Great Lakes and minimal economic impacts to Michigan customers (e.g., two cents more at the gas pump and roughly 10 to 25 cents more for propane in the Upper Peninsula). 
It is time for the state to reject the flawed study, exercise its affirmative legal duty as public trustee of the Great Lakes and bottomlands, and shut down Line 5. The state should use that authority to revoke the 1953 easement agreement that Enbridge has consistently violated.

The risk of a spill is too great to allow Line 5 to continue to operate in the Great Lakes. Our state government should not put the Great Lakes, our economy, health, drinking water, fisheries, and way of life at risk from a catastrophic oil spill any longer. In fact, on November 16, the Coast Guard Coast commandant testified again to Congress that his agency is not prepared to clean up a large-scale pipeline oil spill in the Great Lakes.

I urge you to act as public trustees of our waters and bottomlands, enforce the easement in light of Enbridge’s ongoing violations, and begin the process of decommissioning Line 5 in the Straits of Mackinac to protect the Great Lakes from a catastrophic oil spill. The State of Michigan has a legal duty to take this enforcement action. Enbridge’s ongoing violations cannot be remedied. It is time for the state to act decisively and with urgency.

Specifically, the report on alternatives to Line 5 in the Mackinac Straits:

  1. Fails to follow the recommendations and standards outlined in the Michigan Petroleum Pipeline Task Force Report, which resulted from a process created by the governor and co-chaired by the attorney general, and therefore cannot be used by the State of Michigan “in making decisions about the future of the Straits Pipelines.”
  2. Neglects to provide the state with an independent, fair analysis of the alternatives to Line 5 as required by the Task Force Report. This final report remains biased toward allowing Line 5 to continue to operate and/or allowing Enbridge to build new oil infrastructure in the Straits of Mackinac and further expand its operations. That bias grows out of past, and potentially future, business relationships between Enbridge and the report’s authors.
  3. Fails to analyze existing pipeline infrastructure as an alternative to Line 5 in the Straits, which the state required Dynamic Risk to analyze, and leaving it out conflicts with Task Force recommendation 3 (b). It is unacceptable that the contractor eliminated this alternative without any analysis. The 1953 easement granted with strict conditions by the state to Enbridge does not guarantee transport of 540,000 barrels per day (bpd) of oil and natural gas liquids. In fact, the 1953 MPSC Order states 300,000 bpd, which means Enbridge is currently operating Line 5 at 80 percent over design capacity. 
  4. Fails to analyze new evidence disclosed by Enbridge affecting the pipeline’s integrity, including external corrosion, 48 bare metal spots caused by the installation of screw anchors, compromised cathodic protection, and historic excessive pipeline spans greater than the 75-feet limit (including a 286-foot span that was unsupported for years), as required by the legal operating agreement with the State of Michigan. Dynamic Risk’s rationale, in part, is that "it would be inappropriate to speculate on any of the above aspects of the coating condition."
  5. Fails to consider tribal sovereign treaty rights and feedback on the basis that Dynamic Risk was not a party to tribal and state consultations, which is an unacceptable dismissal of input by a key stakeholder. 
  6. Grossly underestimates the total economic spill costs at between $147 million and $310 million, when Enbridge’s cleanup costs of its 2010 Line 6B pipeline oil spill along a 40-mile stretch of the Kalamazoo River cost more than $1.2 billion.
  7. Overestimates an impact to propane supply, greatly exceeding what independent experts have determined would be necessary to provide the Upper Peninsula’s Rapid River facility with an alternative supply. The flawed report finds that up to 35 railcars per week or 15 truckloads per day would be necessary, while another study found it would take only one railcar or 3 - 4 truckloads per day to replace the Line 5 propane supply to the U.P.
  8. Continues to show an unfair bias towards building a tunneled pipeline in the Mackinac Straits. The report estimates a much lower cost for a tunnel than other estimates for this type of infrastructure; it fails to consider the risk of a spill to the Great Lakes, rivers and streams from other portions of the 64-year-old pipeline if the Straits portion were rebuilt. Dynamic Risk prefers new pipelines, which was evident when the firm aggressively promoted building a tunnel in its proposal to do this report, and its analysis is deeply flawed.


Help Reach the Next Goal: 6,000 comments

Will you submit your comment?

or Text PROTECT to +12314804112 to sign or Text PROTECT! to +12314804112 to sign

Showing 3502 reactions

  • Linda Coyne
    signed 2017-12-22 14:22:40 -0500
  • Eric Ederer
    signed 2017-12-22 14:21:01 -0500
    As an MPH, I am deeply concerned about a Great Lakes public health water emergency— especially for Northern Michigan— being caused by the likely failure of Line 5 in the near future. The only way to avoid this is a complete shutdown of Line 5; the pipeline is simply too old and in too dangerous a place for any other stopgap measure to work. We must shut down Line 5 now to protect the overall well being of the Great Lakes and the people of Northern Michigan.
  • Susan Rans
    signed 2017-12-22 14:20:57 -0500
    If the proposed tunnel or a new line is so necessary, then the old l8nes should be shut down completely until the new feature is completed and checked by an independent engineering firm. Enbridge should bear all costs of construction and monitoring in perpetuity. But the wisest action would be to close down Line 5 for good and invest in renewables.
  • David Perry
    signed 2017-12-22 14:12:35 -0500
    Sirs, at every turn the Enbridge company has been untruthful n its attempts to keep the line open. There are multiple lines on land that are open for use and should an event occur will be far less costly to the environment and state. I oppose keep the line open, shut it down. David Perry Holland, Michigan
  • Lynn Armbruster
    signed 2017-12-22 14:07:28 -0500
    It is absolutely shameful that governor Snyder’s backroom deals with Enbridge continue to leave our pristine Great Lakes in grave peril. The time to shut down line 5 is BEFORE a massive, catastrophic spill occurs. We must hold Snyder and Schuette accountable for their actions. Shut down line 5 immediately. A spill of any proportion will cripple the straights area tourism for many years to come.
  • Chelsea Thompson
    signed 2017-12-22 14:06:41 -0500
    We all saw the destruction that Enbridge Line 6B wreaked on the Kalamazoo River Valley. The environmental impact was only the first in a chain of devastating consequences to the Kalamazoo area’s quality of life, its tourism draw, and ultimately its economy. As someone who moved both their life and business to the Lake Superior region because of its natural beauty and purity, I stand adamantly against the preservation of an oil line that, by virtue of its location within the Straits of Mackinaw, could wreak even greater destruction on this region. The environment here is foundational to every factor of our lives, personally and professionally. Do not endanger our economy and our quality of life by allowing this oil line to remain here any longer. Decommission Line 5 and allow the Great Lakes region to flourish.
  • Sar Campbell
    signed 2017-12-22 14:04:39 -0500
  • Tara Verbridge
    signed 2017-12-22 14:01:16 -0500
    Please save the water!!!
  • Mitchell Ronaldson
    signed 2017-12-22 14:00:16 -0500
    Shut down line 5. Clean the line out and remove it from the ocean. Someone has to be accountable for the pipelines that make these companies billions of dollars. They shouldn’t be able to just walk away and leave these pipelines abandoned. They should have to remove them when their lifespan has run its course.
  • Patrick Allen
    signed 2017-12-22 13:59:43 -0500
    Please protect the Great Lakes!
  • Lauren Marie McGrath
    signed 2017-12-22 13:53:18 -0500
    Please protect our wildlife and the economic prosperity we receive from healthy Great Lakes
  • Elizabeth Carrick
    signed 2017-12-22 13:53:01 -0500
  • Sandra Terry-Morrison
    signed 2017-12-22 13:52:24 -0500
    Shut down line 5 Immediately. It is dangerous!!! These idiots have no respect for the environment and planet earth. We all need clean water, air and earth if we expect to survive, and Line 5 could put an end to life in Michigan as we know it.
  • Mary Lane
    signed 2017-12-22 13:49:29 -0500
    Too often we have been told by industry scientists not to worry about potential environmental pollution, that it won’t happen. Many of our concerns have repeatdly been shown to be valid and very possible. I am very concerned that Great Lakes water is one of our most valuable PUBLIC resources, not for sale or damage at any price, as lives depend on it! Take action now before this old pipeline destroys our precious environment, our heritage, our beliefs in democaracy itslef!
  • Patricia Dutkiewicz
    signed via 2017-12-22 13:48:13 -0500
    The Great Lakes are one of the most vital water resources in the US. Please learn from all of the prior catastrophes and shut down line 5.
  • Laura Wong
    signed 2017-12-22 13:38:06 -0500
    Over the past 50 years, Enbridge has spilled at least 1.1 million gallons from

    Line 5 alone. Spills are an inherent inevitability with results that can only be, at great expense, superficially undone. We live in one of the most fantastically beautiful and diverse environments on earth. Shall we leave leave anything for our children? Conservation is the only viable starting point for any progress we can make and we are out of time. Do not allow any pipeline under our beloved Great Lakes. Please invest in a sustainable future.
  • Michael Kwitt
    signed 2017-12-22 13:36:26 -0500
  • Jordan Jones
    posted about this on Facebook 2017-12-22 13:34:10 -0500
    JOIN ME and tell the State of Michigan the only acceptable way to protect the Great Lakes is to SHUTDOWN LINE 5.
  • Jordan Jones
    signed via 2017-12-22 13:33:49 -0500
  • Patricia Cox
    signed 2017-12-22 13:33:12 -0500
  • Richard Pichiotino
    followed this page 2017-12-22 13:23:28 -0500
  • Elizabeth Snyder
    signed 2017-12-22 13:22:13 -0500
    The Great Lakes MUST be protected. Leakage or rupture of the aging Line 5 would be a pollution catastrophe for the Great Lakes. Decommission it now and make a plan that avoids future spill risk.
  • Brenna Kolstad
    signed via 2017-12-22 13:19:21 -0500
  • Terry (Theresa) Townley
    signed 2017-12-22 13:17:55 -0500
    Line 5 is old, poorly maintained, has been mismanaged, and lies in some of the strongest currents to be found. Common sense alone says it should be shut down permanently and alternatives explored. Dr. Arthur and Judith Frock, Midland, Michigan
  • Pam Hall
    signed 2017-12-22 13:07:08 -0500
    There is only so much toxic sludge the earth can take before it won’t be able to recover, we’ve already seen the devastation. We ALL should be doing everything we can to avoid use of carbon based fuels, not expediating our demise for corporate profits of the few. The greedy & very rich just gave themselves a huge tax break. Which dangerous toy will these spoiled, completely out of touch with reality babies use to destroy all life on earth with, nukes or the pollution they deny exists? You can’t drink oil, & you can’t eat money.
  • Catherine Murphy
    signed 2017-12-22 13:04:29 -0500
    The Great Lakes are one of Michigan’s greatest assets. Damage done to these lakes would be devastating to the state’s economy. Please do the responsible thing and decommission Line 5.
  • patricia49612
    @patricia49612 tweeted link to this page. 2017-12-22 13:03:45 -0500
    JOIN ME and tell the State of Michigan the only acceptable way to protect the Great Lakes is to SHUTDOWN LINE 5. http://www.oilandwaterdontmix.org/submit_your_line_5_comment?recruiter_id=55342
  • Patricia Mccleery
    signed 2017-12-22 13:01:44 -0500
    Enbridge plans to run this line 5 till it bursts, you must shut down the line now.
  • James Bush
    posted about this on Facebook 2017-12-22 12:56:20 -0500
    JOIN ME and tell the State of Michigan the only acceptable way to protect the Great Lakes is to SHUTDOWN LINE 5.
  • James Bush
    signed 2017-12-22 12:56:05 -0500
    Enough already, shut it down!

You can help now.

Join those working to protect the Great Lakes & climate from the Enbridge Line 5 crude oil pipeline.

Get updates