When you sign, we'll submit this as your official comment by the December 17 deadline calling on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to deny the Enbridge tunnel permit.
Enbridge wants the federal government to rubber-stamp a Clean Water Act permit that would allow the Canadian company to dump up to 5 million gallons of wastewater a day into the Great Lakes during tunnel construction. They believe we should ignore the danger of oil pipelines and a dangerously flawed plan to build an underground tunnel in the Straits of Mackinac.
SIGN THE PETITION
Burying the problem of oil pipelines in a tunnel in the Great Lakes doesn’t make it go away. What's more, every day the oil does make its way to refineries and burned as gasoline and propane it spills carbon into the atmosphere, making everything worse.
I request that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers conduct an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in connection with Enbridge Energy’s application for a Department of the Army permit for a massive fossil fuel tunnel in the Straits of Mackinac.
The project submitted by Enbridge is intentionally designed to avoid full review under the law and thorough analysis. Enbridge characterizes its project as replacing an old dual pipeline system in the Straits of Mackinac to continue transporting crude oil and petroleum liquids between the peninsulas of Michigan. In fact, the project would irreversibly commit the natural and other resources of the United States, Michigan, and the Great Lakes for another 99 years and presents unacceptable risks to those resources.
A project of this magnitude, with its potential for causing significant harm to public trust resources, must be very carefully and thoroughly considered. The Army Corps must prepare an EIS under NEPA because Enbridge’s proposed tunnel activity constitutes a “Major Federal Action Significantly Affecting the Quality of the Human Environment.” The need for a full EIS that analyzes the project as submitted by Enbridge and the entire 645-mile Line 5 pipeline is required, as detailed in the July 14, 2020 comments submitted to the Army Corps by 10 organizations representing tribal, environmental, and other citizens groups.
In addition, since those comments were submitted, additional information has also revealed the need for an EIS under NEPA:
- Significant flaws in Enbridge's tunnel proposal, including mischaracterization of the geological formations that will be encountered, a lack of geotechnical research, the tunnel design and alignment, and the potential for devastating outcomes due to poor planning and cutting corners in research and design.
- A potentially significant archeological finding at the proposed tunnel project site subject to the National Historic Preservation Act.
Showing 1158 reactions
Even without considering the impact of carbon-based fuels on our environment, we must face the economic fact that it is becoming less and less profitable to access, transport and sell “dirty fuels.”Most companies are gradually turning to more economical “green fuels.”
It is no longer wise to invest in more ways of transporting a dying commodity. We need to turn our backs on the familiar, tired ways and move into this still fairly new millennium. We need to keep up with the newer, and cleaner fuels. Many other nations are already leading us in making these necessary changes to save our planet and live with a clean conscience.
Thank you very much for protecting/saving our beautiful great lakes.
It, along with the other surrounding Great Lakes that border the State of Michigan, are a fully integrated and irreplaceable part of our public water utility infrastructure.
No Foreign company should ever have the right or opportunity to risk the security of our State or Local public utilities!