TAKE ACTION

When you sign, we'll submit this as your official comment by the December 17 deadline calling on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to deny the Enbridge tunnel permit.

5 Million Gallons a Day

Enbridge wants the federal government to rubber-stamp a Clean Water Act permit that would allow the Canadian company to dump up to 5 million gallons of wastewater a day into the Great Lakes during tunnel construction. They believe we should ignore the danger of oil pipelines and a dangerously flawed plan to build an underground tunnel in the Straits of Mackinac.

SIGN THE PETITION

Burying the problem of oil pipelines in a tunnel in the Great Lakes doesn’t make it go away. What's more, every day the oil does make its way to refineries and burned as gasoline and propane it spills carbon into the atmosphere, making everything worse.

PETITION

I request that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers conduct an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in connection with Enbridge Energy’s application for a Department of the Army permit for a massive fossil fuel tunnel in the Straits of Mackinac.

The project submitted by Enbridge is intentionally designed to avoid full review under the law and thorough analysis. Enbridge characterizes its project as replacing an old dual pipeline system in the Straits of Mackinac to continue transporting crude oil and petroleum liquids between the peninsulas of Michigan. In fact, the project would irreversibly commit the natural and other resources of the United States, Michigan, and the Great Lakes for another 99 years and presents unacceptable risks to those resources.

A project of this magnitude, with its potential for causing significant harm to public trust resources, must be very carefully and thoroughly considered. The Army Corps must prepare an EIS under NEPA because Enbridge’s proposed tunnel activity constitutes a “Major Federal Action Significantly Affecting the Quality of the Human Environment.” The need for a full EIS that analyzes the project as submitted by Enbridge and the entire 645-mile Line 5 pipeline is required, as detailed in the July 14, 2020 comments submitted to the Army Corps by 10 organizations representing tribal, environmental, and other citizens groups.

In addition, since those comments were submitted, additional information has also revealed the need for an EIS under NEPA:

  1. Significant flaws in Enbridge's tunnel proposal, including mischaracterization of the geological formations that will be encountered, a lack of geotechnical research, the tunnel design and alignment, and the potential for devastating outcomes due to poor planning and cutting corners in research and design.
  2. A potentially significant archeological finding at the proposed tunnel project site subject to the National Historic Preservation Act.
1,294 SIGNATURES
Help Reach the Next Goal: 1,250 signatures

Will you sign?

or Text TUNNEL to +12314804112 to sign

Showing 1159 reactions

  • Charles King
    signed 2020-12-15 21:54:34 -0500
  • James Penrod
    signed 2020-12-15 20:50:33 -0500
  • Renee Russell
    signed 2020-12-15 19:11:08 -0500
  • Kevin Rogers
    signed 2020-12-15 18:50:46 -0500
  • Dino Pizzino
    signed 2020-12-15 18:25:37 -0500
    Get oil out of the Great Lakes
  • Jacob Brenner
    signed 2020-12-15 18:16:23 -0500
  • Susan Thompson
    signed 2020-12-15 17:27:33 -0500
  • Jen G
    signed 2020-12-15 17:21:01 -0500
    Nooooooo pollution! Our planet needs life!
  • Chuck Korson
    signed 2020-12-15 17:16:18 -0500
  • Griffin Decker
    signed 2020-12-15 16:33:51 -0500
  • Jean Dickelman
    signed 2020-12-15 16:04:11 -0500
  • Anne Jacobson
    signed 2020-12-15 15:40:44 -0500
  • Sasha Ruddy
    signed via 2020-12-15 13:33:03 -0500
  • Christi Kargl
    signed 2020-12-15 10:42:15 -0500
    We need to preserve the Great Lakes. We deserve clean water to be enjoyed by our communities. Intentionally putting the Great Lakes at very high risk for oil contamination is detrimental for the preservation of the Great Lakes.
  • Andrew Dehan
    signed 2020-12-15 10:37:01 -0500
  • Abbie Brooks
    signed 2020-12-15 10:33:57 -0500
    Enbridge has not shown integrity or concern our Great Lakes. Why are we putting our most precious natural wonder at needless risk for a company that provides such a miniscule economic benefit to Michigan? What economic impact would a spill or other disaster have on our environment and industry that is built upon our Great Lakes? The risk is absolutely not worth the reward.
  • Janet Hickman
    signed via 2020-12-15 10:29:50 -0500
    Please. We need science based, trustworthy evaluation, not just some company’s lawyers battling state lawyers. Thank you.
  • Patricia VanDyke
    signed 2020-12-15 09:45:01 -0500
  • Keverne Lehman
    signed 2020-12-15 08:51:27 -0500
  • Andy Hickman
    signed 2020-12-15 07:52:29 -0500
  • Robert Cerrito
    signed via 2020-12-15 06:49:43 -0500
  • Sarah Primeau
    signed 2020-12-15 03:34:24 -0500
  • Nancy Schoenheide
    signed 2020-12-15 02:08:43 -0500
  • Jen Saltzman
    signed 2020-12-15 00:19:35 -0500
  • Natalie smith
    signed 2020-12-14 23:43:23 -0500
    The Great Lakes are too precious of a resource to risk a massive oil spill, which we know will be detrimental to the environment, ecosystem and economy.
  • Craig Turbull
    signed 2020-12-14 21:54:44 -0500
  • Shannon Kubenez
    signed 2020-12-14 21:32:09 -0500
  • Peter Ford
    signed 2020-12-14 21:30:02 -0500
  • Dannica Krishnamra-Krairiksh
    signed 2020-12-14 20:47:58 -0500
  • Sally Van Vleck
    signed 2020-12-14 20:13:58 -0500

You can help now.


Join those working to protect the Great Lakes & climate from the Enbridge Line 5 crude oil pipeline.

Get updates