← Back to News

Gov. Whitmer and DNR Revoke Line 5 Easement

Citizens groups are widely celebrating Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s historic announcement today that she is taking action permanently revoking Enbridge’s Line 5 easement as she puts Michigan on a legal footing to end the threat of a catastrophic oil pipeline failure in the Great Lakes.

Victory for the Great Lakes and Climate

Download the notice of revocation and court filings

“Governor Whitmer’s decisive action today to shut down Line 5 fulfills her public trust duty to protect the Great Lakes,” said Sean McBrearty, campaign coordinator for Oil & Water Don’t Mix. “Enbridge has played fast and loose with their duty of care for these dangerous oil pipelines, and the governor is holding them accountable for their irresponsible behavior that threatens the Great Lakes every single day. Michiganders who care about the Great Lakes and our northern Michigan economy--and that’s certainly all of us--welcome the governor’s strong actions that put Michigan and Great Lakes first.”

Let's celebrate - but Enbridge is sure to fight this and we need to be ready. DONATE NOW

Whitmer’s decision gives Enbridge 180 days--until mid-May--to complete the process of shutting down Line 5. Attorney General Dana Nessel today filed a legal action in Ingham Circuit Court on Whitmer’s behalf to force the shutdown. Whitmer said the continued operation of LIne 5 is an “unreasonable risk,” citing Enbridge’s “persistent and incurable violations of the easement’s terms and conditions.” The new lawsuit will bring claims in addition to Nessel’s lawsuit filed in 2019, seeking the shutdown of Line 5, which remains pending before Judge James Jamo.

Tell USACE to Deny Oil Tunnel Permit

Send a comment to tell the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to deny the Enbridge oil tunnel permit.

The federal Environmental Protection Agency in June fined Enbridge $6.7 million after federal regulators said Enbridge failed to properly evaluate dents to pipelines along the company’s Lakehead Pipeline System, which includes the Line 5 pipeline that crosses the open waters of the Straits of Mackinac and through 400 other Michigan waterways.

“This is a huge moment for the thousands of people who have worked for over seven years to shut down this dangerous and polluting oil pipeline that threatens the Great Lakes and the climate,” said Kate Madigan, Director of the Michigan Climate Action Network. “Our Governor has shown once again that she puts the people of Michigan and the Great Lakes first and she is looking out for our best interests. Standing up to Enbridge - one of the largest and most powerful companies on the planet - takes courage, something that Governor Whitmer has in spades.”

Whitmer’s legal move today also follows an Analysis of the Enbridge Financial Assurances report to the State of Michigan by financial experts. The American Risk Management Resources Network documented the state’s potential financial liability from a Line 5 failure resulting in a catastrophic spill that could impact up to 700 miles of Great Lakes coastline.

"This decision to decommission Line 5 is a much-needed step to heal the environment and our place in it.” - Bill Latka, TC350 Coordinator

“Today’s decisive action by Governor Whitmer and DNR Director Eichinger represents a clear victory for the Great Lakes and the citizens and tribes of Michigan,” said Liz Kirkwood, executive director of FLOW (For Love of Water), the Traverse City-based Great Lakes law and policy center. “As public trustees of our waters, the State of Michigan is affirmatively upholding the rule of law and protecting the public’s treasured Great Lakes from the clear and present danger of an oil spill catastrophe from Enbridge’s Line 5 pipeline.”

Over the past five years, Enbridge has violated its easement agreement with the state by failing to disclose pipeline damage, corrosion, and numerous missing pipeline support structures. In 2016 it was revealed that Enbridge kept an Upper Peninsula oil spill hidden for 30 years, including the excavation of 825 tons of contaminated soil from the Hiawatha National Forest.

Enbridge’s track record includes:

  • Enbridge’s negligence caused the largest oil pipeline rupture in Michigan history into the Kalamazoo River watershed near Marshall 10 years ago this July. Still, they were allowed to construct an even larger pipeline to replace the old Line 6B that ruptured.
  • Enbridge’s prior track record on fines in Michigan includes $177 million in civil penalties, $1.3 billion in damages, and more than 2.3 million gallons of spilled oil.
  • Enbridge lied about Line 5 safety when it knew that since 2003 numerous bottom support anchors were missing and failed to disclose it until 2017, nine months after a report documented that pipeline spans of up to 286 feet had no anchor support.
  • In 2017 Enbridge claimed that missing protective coatings along the Straits pipeline were a mere “hypothetical” possibility, while at the same time a video in their possession showed areas of missing coatings and the company had known of bare spots since 2014.
  • Enbridge’s claims about Line 5 pipeline safety were put to the test when an anchor was deployed in the Straits of Mackinac in April 2018, denting and gouging Line 5. Enbridge’s technology failed that test when, despite the damage to Line 5, no warnings were triggered. Three weeks passed before underwater vehicles contracted by Enbridge could safely navigate the turbulent Straits to put eyes on the damage.

“It’s now crystal clear that we must ramp down fossil fuel use to address the climate crisis,” said Bill Latka, TC350 coordinator. “It’s not only the scientists ringing alarms, but we see the terrible effects of our overheating climate on human health in Michigan with floods, freak storms, and a rising and warming Great Lakes. This decision to decommission Line 5 is a much-needed step to heal the environment and our place in it.”

Showing 9 reactions

  • Josh Carpenter
    commented 2021-05-13 13:09:40 -0400
    This is hilarious. From the misleading title to the fact that there’s less than a paragraph of factual information, which is presented either completely out of context or so skewed it makes everything else you “report” suspect. “We need to end our reliance on fossil fuels”! Really? With what? Electric vehicles? Where do you think electricity comes from? We already divert NIAGRA FALLS 50-90% to make energy needs. And where’s the infrastructure going to come from to suddenly support so these EVs? We’re already experiencing brown outs every year. Until we can find a VIABLE way to replace oil, we’re stuck with it. Unless you people are willing to forgo your iPhones and air conditioning, lighting and refrigeration, hell even water heaters and wells…. You literally are going to have to make choices. We can’t produce enough electricity WITH oil at this point. The electrical grid we have in place can NOT cope with a sudden massive demand like EVs. And YOU won’t be able to afford the massive upcharge on energy that’s coming with things like new systems, wiring, etc that all have to be installed to ever have a hope of supporting our growing use, and we still can’t produce enough without oil. Renewables? Who’s gonna pay for that massive (you obviously don’t understand utilities) endeavor? Who’s going to post to develop the technologies that don’t even exist to make this a possibility even? You think the government or corporations will? And won’t pass the cost back on YOU, take it from YOUR taxes? As for your so called “news”, you neglected to mention that we have a treaty as a nation with Canada that guarantees Michigan can’t do anything here. It would require the US 10 YEARS notice to back out from the treaty and it’s not gonna happen over one state and one pipe. Btw, since a part of that line provides natural gas to MICHIGAN, where are they gonna get power now? And who’s gonna pay for the about 2000-3000 tanker trucks a day needed to replace the pipe? You think the majority of Michigan wants to see there utility costs rise to compensate? Where’s that money gonna come from when so many can barely afford to keep their power on, especially considering the racket that utility providers here are. Btw- do you really think that 2,000 minimum semi trucks moving this stuff daily is going to A: produce less pollution? or B: be any less of a risk of a catastrophic environmental accident, being that they’ll be on the road with regular traffic?
  • Charles Buxton
    followed this page 2020-11-14 11:27:51 -0500
  • Terry Birchler
    followed this page 2020-11-14 10:57:42 -0500
  • Roger Selvig
    followed this page 2020-11-13 22:52:29 -0500
  • James Bruce Craig
    followed this page 2020-11-13 20:24:23 -0500
  • Gretchen Iorio
    followed this page 2020-11-13 17:53:06 -0500
  • Lou Ann Mckimmy
    followed this page 2020-11-13 15:29:43 -0500
  • Cathy Munday
    followed this page 2020-11-13 15:24:21 -0500
  • Bill Latka
    published this page in News 2020-11-13 13:26:20 -0500

You can help now.

Join those working to protect the Great Lakes & climate from the Enbridge Line 5 crude oil pipeline.

Get updates