READ THE TROUBLING FACTS surrounding the Synder-Enbridge oil tunnel deal.

Enbridge and Michigan's Governor made a backroom deal to explore build a tunnel in the Straits of Mackinac that would keep Canadian oil flowing through the Great Lakes for at least 7 to 10 more years, if not forever. The deal would also put the Mackinac Bridge Authority and Michigan taxpayers at financial risk.

We have questions. You probably do too.

On November 8 in St. Ignace, Enbridge will pitch its tunnel proposal to members of the bridge authority for the first time. Gov. Snyder wants the bridge authority to own Enbridge’s tunnel, marking the first time since the authority was created in 1950 that its sole mission of maintaining and operating the Mighty Mac would be compromised.

Let the Mackinac Bridge Authority know your thoughts about this proposed tunnel for Canadian oil

Bridge authority members are inviting questions from the public, which is great. The bridge authority was not asked in advance by the Snyder administration to be part of this mess, so we encourage you to respectfully email authority Secretary Bob Sweeney with your questions. 

Click to compose an email to Bob Sweeney or copy his address: [email protected]

Here are some questions you may choose to ask the bridge authority (feel free to copy & paste):

Why should the bridge authority own the risky tunnel and be saddled with Enbridge through a 99-year lease, especially given Enbridge’s horrible track record in Michigan?

Why should the bridge authority assume financial risk in the event of a tunnel collapse and pipeline rupture for a private Canadian oil company when most of the oil in Enbridge’s Line 5 is for Canada’s use?

The agreement between Enbridge and Gov. Snyder would only provide $1.88 billion in financial pledges from Enbridge in the case of major damages when economists estimate the cost of a worst-case spill could reach $6.3 billion. Why should the bridge authority potentially put the financial health of the Mackinac Bridge at risk by taking responsibility for Enbridge’s oil tunnel?

Why is the administration considering bypassing a thorough environmental review of the Snyder-Enbridge oil tunnel under the Great Lakes Submerged Lands Act instead of looking at better alternatives which include decommissioning Line 5 now?

Once you send your email let us know by reporting it below. We also invite you to attend the November 8th meeting where Enbridge will present their oil tunnel plan to the Mackinac Bridge Authority. RSVP Here.


266 Emails Sent
300 Emails

Did you send and email?

Showing 277 reactions

  • Carrie Veldman
    BarFly Ventures endorsed 2018-10-16 10:45:28 -0400
  • Frank Vaydik
    endorsed 2018-10-16 10:45:10 -0400
  • Paul Czajka
    endorsed 2018-10-16 10:44:05 -0400
    Pipe lines and tunnels in the Great Lakes is wrong. We to protect our fresh water.
  • Kristin Green
    endorsed 2018-10-16 10:41:30 -0400
  • carol mckay
    endorsed 2018-10-16 10:40:23 -0400
    Please remove line 5 from the straights of Mackinaw. The loss to the state was kill the economy if we have a break. The Island is in danger.

    We need to protect our most valuable resource for future generations. We are one state that has the beauty of woods and water. We need to protect the water it is the life blood of our state. Please vote against this oil line.
  • James Jaster
    endorsed 2018-10-16 10:39:54 -0400
  • Laura Lyons
    endorsed 2018-10-16 10:39:17 -0400

You can help now.

Join those working to protect the Great Lakes & climate from the Enbridge Line 5 crude oil pipeline.

Get updates